Harrosh

Harrosh v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 25, 20222:21-cv-01969California1,027 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Michael Harrosh, No. 2:21-cv-01969-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, TEMPORARY

B RESTRAINING

v. ORDER Tahoe Regional Planning Agency; George and Virginia Johannessen, Defendants. 17 Plaintiff Michael Harrosh applies ex parte for a temporary restraining order barring any 19 further construction of a pier off 5568 North Lake Boulevard in Placer County, California. ECF No. 34. Harrosh’s counsel has certified in writing that he gave defendants’ counsel notice of his client’s intent to seek a temporary restraining order. See Prows Decl. 3, ECF No. 34-3. Defendants’ counsel also received service of the ex parte application through the court’s CM/ECF system. A temporary restraining order may be issued upon a showing “that immediate and 25 irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.