Tate
(PC) Snowden v. Tate
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL L. SNOWDEN, Case No. 1:19-cv-00843-AWI-CDB (PC)
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
GRANT DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
H. TATE; M. TOSCANO, (Doc. 34)
Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
16 Plaintiff Daniel L. Snowden is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of his complaint on June 17, 2019. (Doc. 1.) Following screening (Doc. 10), Plaintiff elected to proceed on the claims found cognizable by the Court (Doc. 11). Therefore, on January 30, 2020, findings and recommendations issued recommending Plaintiff’s claims be dismissed except for his claims of retaliation against Defendants Tate and Toscano and a deliberate indifference to serious medical needs claim against Defendant Tate. (See Docs. 10 & 13.)…