Neel

(PC) Cortinas v. Neel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20222:21-cv-00611California1,033 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LARRY WILLIAM CORTINAS, No. 2:21-cv-0611 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

KATHERINE NEEL, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After waiving service of the complaint, defendants requested and were granted an extension of time to file their responses to the complaint. ECF Nos. 22, 24, 25. Defendants Gates, Lynch, and Sahota have now filed a motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status (ECF No. 34), which has been joined by defendant Bobbala (ECF No. 32), and defendant Soltanian-Zadeh has filed a motion to dismiss (ECF No. 33). Gates, Lynch, Sahota, and Bobbala have also requested that their time to respond to the complaint be extended until there has been a ruling on their motion to revoke plaintiff’s in forma pauperis status. ECF Nos. 31, 32. The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.