Anderson
Anderson v. Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 EDWARD ANDERSON, RAYMOND KEITH No. 2:18-cv-00714-JAM-AC
CORUM, JESSE AND COLLEEN
WORTHINGTON, and JANET GORAL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS
Plaintiffs, v. EDWARD D. JONES & CO., L.P.
SECURITIES LITIGATION,
18 Defendant. 19 The matter before the Court is Edward D. Jones & Co., L.P.’s (“Defendant”) motion to dismiss the third amended complaint (“TAC”) filed by Edward Anderson, Raymond Keith Corum, Colleen and Jesse Worthington, and Janet Goral (“Plaintiffs”). See Mot. to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 83. Plaintiffs opposed the motion. See Opp’n, ECF No. 87. Defendant replied. See Reply, ECF No. 89. /// /// For the reasons set forth below, this Court DENIES Defendant’s motion to dismiss.1 3 I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Defendant is a Missouri Limited Partnership headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri that is dually registered as a…