Arrizola

(PC) Brooks v. Arrizola

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20221:20-cv-00476California861 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

LAMAR BROOKS, 1:20-cv-00476-JLT-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS CASE FOR FAILURE TO

vs. OBEY COURT ORDER (ECF No. 37.) ARRIZOLA, et al.,

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

16 I. BACKGROUND Lamar Brooks (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on April 3, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On September 16, 2022, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition within thirty days to Defendant Arrizola’s motion for summary judgment which was filed on August 17, 2022. (ECF No. 37.) The thirty-day time period has now expired and Plaintiff has not filed any response to the motion for summary judgment.1 Therefore, Plaintiff failed to comply with the court’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.