Unknown

(HC) Foster v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 26, 20221:22-cv-00866California524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS R. FOSTER, No. 1:22-cv-0866 JLT HBK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, DECLINING TO ISSUE

UNKNOWN, CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY, AND

DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE

Respondent. CASE (Doc. 10) 17 Petitioner Carlos R. Foster is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The assigned magistrate judge found Petitioner failed to state a cognizable claim and failed to exhaust administrative remedies. Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the petition be dismissed on August 19, 2022. (Doc. 10.) The Findings and Recommendations were served upon Petitioner and contained notice…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.