(PS)Chiu

(PS)Chiu v. Trump

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 27, 20222:22-cv-00764California309 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAIFUSIN CHIU, No. 2:22-cv-0764 KJM AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER DONALD TRUMP/STORAGE/CHOKE

ME STORY,

15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by Local Rule 302(c)(21). On May 11, 2022 the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. ECF No. 3. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations, though he has filed a letter and two unauthorized amended complaints. ECF Nos. 4, 5, 6. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See Robbins v. Carey, 481 F.3d 1143, 1147 (9th Cir.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.