(PS) Nelson-Rogers v. JP Morgan Chase Bank
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY ALICE NELSON RODGERS, No. 2:22–cv–1799–DAD–CKD PS Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
AND ORDER DENYING TRO
v. (ECF No. ) JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, Defendant. 16 On October 27, 2022, plaintiff filed an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO). Plaintiff asks the court to enjoin defendant from executing an unlawful detainer. (ECF No. 6 at 1). The undersigned recommends denying plaintiff’s motion because plaintiff is unlikely to succeed on the merits of her claim. Further, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why the case should not be dismissed and why a pre-filing vexatious litigant order should not be entered barring her from filing further cases against this defendant regarding the property. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a serial litigant who has filed three prior actions arising from the foreclosure on her now-former residential mortgage. See 2:21-cv-02151-JAM-KJN; 2:21-cv-1809-JAM-AC; 2:21-cv-1908-JAM-KJN.…