Lund
Lund v. Datzman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 11 ERIC LUND, et al., No. 2:19-cv-02287-JAM-DMC Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER OF PARTIAL VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Per
JEFFREY DATZMAN, et al., Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2))
16 Defendants.
18 Having received a request from Plaintiff ERIC LUND pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 19 Procedure 41(a)(2) for a court order in the above-entitled matter that judicially bars under Heck v. 20 Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) and voluntarily dismisses WITHOUT prejudice those claims 21 identified as Causes of Action 39, 40, 42, 49, 50, 53, 54, 55, 71, and 72 in the Second Amended 22 Complaint (ECF 43), and finding good cause therein; 23 It is HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. Plaintiff ERIC LUND’s claims identified as Causes of Action 39, 40, 42, 49, 50, 25 53, 54, 55, 71, and 72 in the Second Amended Complaint (ECF 43) are judicially barred by Heck 26 v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994) until his extant conviction is…