(PS) Valdivia v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20222:22-cv-01643California1,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL MARQUEZ VALDIVIA, No. 2:22-cv-1643 KJM DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK

TO SEND MATERIALS FOR SERVICE

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., AND REQUIRING SERVICE BY

UNITED STATES MARSHAL

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Miguel Marquez Valdivia is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Pending before the court are plaintiff’s complaint and motion to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1 & 2.) Therein, plaintiff complain that the defendants failed to address plaintiff’s serious medical needs while plaintiff was incarcerated at the Sacramento County Jail. The court is required to screen complaints brought by parties proceeding in forma pauperis. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2); see also Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). Here, plaintiff’s in forma pauperis…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.