Guibord

(PC) Turner v. Guibord

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaOctober 31, 20222:19-cv-00416California402 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANTHONY DEWAYNE LEE TURNER, No. 2:19-cv-0416 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO CITY FIRE DEPT., et al., 14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff, a former state prisoner, proceeds pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case proceeds on plaintiff’s fourth amended complaint filed on October 14, 2020. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff has filed two requests for a copy of the transcript of his July 21, 2022 deposition. (ECF Nos. 76, 78.) Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(e)(1) provides, pertinent part: “On request by the deponent . . . before the deposition is completed, the deponent must be allowed 30 days after being notified by the officer that the transcript . . . is available in which: (A) to review the transcript. . . .; and (B) if there are changes in form or substance, to sign a statement listing the changes and the reasons for making them.” Here, though, plaintiff does not indicate that he requested, before the completion of his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.