Hill-Colbert

Hill-Colbert v. City of Roseville

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 1, 20222:22-cv-01651California2,731 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 MARCUS HILL-COLBERT, on behalf No. 2:22-cv-01651 WBS DB of himself and a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

v. CITY OF ROSEVILLE, ROSEVILLE

POLICE DEPARTMENT, TYLER

CANTLEY, and DOES 1 to 20, Defendants. 19 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiff Marcus Hill-Colbert brought this action against the City of Roseville (“City”), Roseville Police Department, Officer Tyler Cantley, and Does 1 to 20 seeking injunctive relief and damages for violations of the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the California Constitution Article I, Section 7(a); and the Tom Bane Civil Rights Act under California Civil Code § 52.1. (Compl. (Docket No. 1).) Plaintiff now moves for a preliminary injunction, seeking to enjoin enforcement of Roseville Municipal Code (“RMC”) § 8.02.316 on the basis that it is a facially…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.