Ammerman
(PC) Hanna v. Ammerman
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN M. HANNA, No. 2:21-CV-2240-DAD-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AMMERMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Defendants’ unopposed motion to dismiss, ECF No. 18. In their motion, Defendants argue that this action must be dismissed without leave to amend because Plaintiff fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under the First Amendment or Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000. See id. After Plaintiff failed to file an opposition to Defendants’ motion within the time provided under the local rules, the Court issued a minute order on September 15, 2022, advising Plaintiff that failure to file an opposition could be construed as consent to the relief requested pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(c),…