(PC) Cross v. Sacramento Jail Medical

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFERY CROSS, Case No. 2:21-cv-02016-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM

SACRAMENTO JAIL MEDICAL, et al.,

RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

Defendants. DAYS 16 On September 1, 2022, the court screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint, notified him that the claims were not sufficiently related to proceed in the same lawsuit, and gave him thirty days to file an amended complaint or advise the court if he wished to stand by his current complaint. ECF No. 10. To date, plaintiff has not filed either an amended complaint or a notice of election to proceed on the current complaint. To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. The court may impose sanctions, including dismissing a case, for failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P.…