(HC)Cardenas

(HC)Cardenas v. Solano County Superior Court Judge

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20222:22-cv-00922California781 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIAN MARTIN CARDENAS, No. 2:22-cv-00922-DAD-DB (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

SOLANO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT HABEAS PETITION DUE TO

JUDGE, PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

AND TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER Respondent. (Doc. No. 6)

17 Petitioner Julian Martin Cardenas is a pretrial detainee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 7, 2022, the court ordered petitioner to either file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the required filing fee in order to proceed with this habeas action. (Doc. No. 5.) The court provided petitioner with thirty days to comply with that order. (Id. at 1.) Petitioner has not paid the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.