Best

(PC) Driver v. Best

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20222:22-cv-01542California1,845 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 BILLY DRIVER, JR., No. 2:22-cv-01542 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

BEST, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that defendants were deliberately indifferent to his health and safety in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend that the motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied. The court will also deny as premature plaintiff’s motion for referral to the Alternative Dispute Resolution program. (ECF No. 8.) //// //// //// //// //// //// IN FORMA PAUPERIS I. In Forma Pauperis Statue The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PLRA”) permits a federal court to authorize the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.