Funderburk

(PC) Outhoummountry v. Funderburk

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20221:22-cv-00954California3,017 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 STACEN OMAR Case No. 1:22-cv-00954-JLT-BAM (PC)

OUTHOUMMOUNTRY,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO Plaintiff, DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM v. (ECF No. 13) FUNDERBURK, et al., 12 Defendants. FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

14 Plaintiff Stacen Omar Outhoummountry (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se 15 and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint 16 was screened, and Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. Plaintiff’s first amended complaint, filed 17 on October 19, 2022, is before the Court for screening. (ECF No. 13.)

I. Screening Requirement and Standard

19 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 20 governmental entity and/or against an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915A(a). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to dismissal if it is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.