(PC) Rader v. County of Placer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20222:19-cv-01265California345 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JACOB RADER, No. 2:19-cv-1265 WBS AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF PLACER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former county jail inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 21, 2022, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. ECF No. 34. The address appears to be a residential one. As a result, plaintiff’s continued in forma pauperis status must be considered. A prisoner granted in forma pauperis status when he filed an action is not liable for the full amount of the filing fee upon release from prison. However, upon release from prison, he must be allowed to apply to proceed under general in forma pauperis provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). See DeBlasio v. Gilmore, 315 F.3d 396, 399…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.