Wagner

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CINDY WAGNER, No. 2:20-cv-00403-JAM-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SHASTA COUNTY, et al., Defendants. 16 This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s motion for summary judgment (“MSJ”). See Mot. for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 90. Plaintiff opposes the motion. See Opp’n, ECF No. 97. Defendant replied. See Reply, ECF No. 99.2 /// /// 23 1 As Defendant points out, Plaintiff’s opposition pleading was untimely under the Court’s local rules. Reply at 3. While “failure to file a timely opposition may [be] construed by the 25 Court as a non-opposition” under Local Rule 230(c), the Court in its discretion will consider the opposition in the interests of 26 judicial economy. 2 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for November 1, 2022. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL…