Davidson

Davidson v. District Attorney of Bakersfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20221:22-cv-00581California1,076 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TREVON FOREMAN AND LOTISHA Case No. 1:22-cv-00581-ADA-CDB

DAVIDSON,

12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. THAT PLAINTIFF TREVON FOREMAN BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO

DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF BAKERSFIELD, COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDERS

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendant. 16 (Doc. 11) 17 21- DAY DEADLINE 18 Plaintiffs Trevon Foreman and Lotisha Davidson (“Plaintiffs”) are proceeding pro se in this action. Plaintiffs filed their complaint against Defendant District Attorney of Bakersfield on May 16, 2022. (Doc. 1.) On that same date, Plaintiff Foreman, a state prisoner, filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) without prepayment of fees. (Doc. 2.) On May 20, 2022, U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto issued an order finding that Plaintiff Foreman failed to submit to the Court a certified copy of his trust fund account statement, providing him another IFP application…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.