Cornerstone Community Alcohol and Other Drug Recovery System v. Service American Indemnity Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20221:22-cv-00225California5,024 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. Introduction

23 On October 28, 2021, Plaintiff Cornerstone Community Alcohol And Other Drug 24 Recovery System, dba Kings Gospel Mission, (“Cornerstone”) commenced this action in the 25 Kings County Superior Court against Defendants Service American Indemnity Company 26 (“SAIC”), Tangram Insurance Services, Inc., (“Tangram”), and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. 27 (“Gallagher”). On December 2, 2021, Plaintiff filed a First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), 28 1 voluntarily dismissing Defendant Tangram. The FAC alleges five causes of action for breach of 2 contract, equitable estoppel, breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, negligent 3 performance of contract, and declaratory judgment. On February 22, 2022, Defendant Gallagher 4 removed the action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446(b)(3), insofar as this 5 Court has original jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s claims on the basis of diversity pursuant to 28 6 U.S.C. § 1332. (Doc. 1.) 7 On March 1, 2022, Defendant Gallagher filed a motion to dismiss the FAC pursuant to 8 Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 12(b)(6) based on failure to state a claim. (Doc. 6.) On March 15, 2022, 9 Plaintiff filed an…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.