Stahl

Stahl v. Klotz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20222:19-cv-00496California7,085 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DUSTY STAHL, No. 2:19-cv-00496-DAD-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’

ROBERT C. KLOTZ, et al., MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR

IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL

Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. No. 43)

17 This matter is before the court on the motion for summary judgment, or in the alternative, partial summary judgment, filed by defendants Robert C. Klotz and Dawn Harmon (“defendants”) on March 28, 2022. ECF No. 43. The court heard oral argument and took the motion under submission on May 6, 2022. ECF No. 47. Attorney James McGlamery appeared on behalf of plaintiff Stahl, and attorney Graham Mills appeared on behalf of defendants. Plaintiff Dusty Stahl (“Stahl”) worked as a court clerk in the Amador County Superior Court until she was terminated in 2018. In this civil rights action brought against defendants (two of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.