D'Agostini

(HC) Craig v. D'Agostini

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 2, 20222:21-cv-00890California768 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORMAN JOHN CRAIG, No. 2:21-cv-00890-DAD-JDP (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

JOHN D’AGOSTINI, et al., HABEAS PETITION FOR FAILURE TO

PROESCUTE, FAILURE TO STATE A

Respondents. CLAIM, AND FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

A COURT ORDER

16 (Doc. No. 20) 17 Petitioner Norman John Craig is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this action, in which petitioner initially filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, though petitioner subsequently suggested that his intent was to bring a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. Nos. 1, 3, 5, 10.) The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On October 7, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed due to petitioner’s failure to prosecute, failure…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.