(PC)Smith

(PC)Smith v. CDCR-CCWF Medical Staff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20221:22-cv-00809California838 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TASIA SMITH, Case No. 1:22-cv-00809-ADA-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. THE CASE FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES

CDCR-CCW MEDICAL STAFF, et al, (ECF No. 10) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Tasia Smith, a state prisoner, initiated this action proceeding pro se by filing a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C § 1983. (ECF No. 1). This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 2, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge issued an order directing Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed for failure to exhaust her administrative remedies prior to initiating the lawsuit. (ECF No. 8). Plaintiff had fourteen days to file a response. (Id. at 2). The Court advised Plaintiff that she could, in the alternative, file a notice of voluntarily dismissal. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.