Hernandez
Hernandez v. Singh
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GERARDO HERNANDEZ, Case No. 2:22-cv-00137-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE DENIED MANGAL SINGH, et al., ECF No. 12 Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
16 Plaintiff alleges that defendants violated his rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act, the California Unruh Civil Rights Act, and California Health and Safety Code § 19953. Defendants have neither answered the complaint nor otherwise appeared in this action. Plaintiff has filed a motion for default judgment, which was before the court for hearing on July 28, 2022. I recommend that plaintiff’s motion be denied. Background The complaint alleges that plaintiff is “substantially limited in his ability to walk and must use a wheelchair for mobility.” ECF No. 1 at 2. Defendants own and operate Four Oaks Market (“Four Oaks”),…