Moreno

(PC) Puckett v. Moreno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20222:22-cv-00650California972 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DURELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 2:22-cv-00650-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: v. (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT

SUBJECT TO A

D. MORENO, et al., RECOMMENDATION OF

DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AND

Defendants. PARTIES, OR (2) FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT

16 ECF No. 12

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, alleges that defendants Smith, Haynes, Williams, and Moreno violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment by refusing to acknowledge that he was suicidal and then failing to help him once he started a fire in his cell. Separately, he alleges that defendant Haynes violated his First Amendment rights by retaliating against him for “complaining.” I have screened the amended complaint and determined that the complaint contains multiple, unrelated claims against more than one defendant. Plaintiff may either proceed only with his Eighth 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.