CDCR
(PC) Muhammad v. CDCR
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KWESI MUHAMMAD, Case No. 2:21-cv-02341-TLN-JDP (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION FOR SCREENING AND
11 v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO
APPOINT COUNSEL
12 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND ECF Nos. 9 & 10 13 REHABILITATION,
SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF’S
14 Defendant. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT STATES
VIABLE ADA AND REHABILITATION
15 ACT CLAIMS AGAINST THE
DEFENDANT
16 ECF No. 8 17
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
18
19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brought this action in state court alleging that defendant 21 California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) violated his rights under the 22 Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Rehabilitation Act when they failed to provide 23 him with an adjustable N95 mask that would not fog his prescription eyeglasses. Defendant 24 removed the action to this court. These allegations, as currently articulated, state…