CDCR

(PC) Muhammad v. CDCR

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20222:21-cv-02341California1,288 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 KWESI MUHAMMAD, Case No. 2:21-cv-02341-TLN-JDP (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION FOR SCREENING AND

11 v. DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

APPOINT COUNSEL

12 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND ECF Nos. 9 & 10 13 REHABILITATION,

SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF’S

14 Defendant. FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT STATES

VIABLE ADA AND REHABILITATION

15 ACT CLAIMS AGAINST THE

DEFENDANT

16 ECF No. 8 17

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

18

19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brought this action in state court alleging that defendant 21 California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”) violated his rights under the 22 Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”) and the Rehabilitation Act when they failed to provide 23 him with an adjustable N95 mask that would not fog his prescription eyeglasses. Defendant 24 removed the action to this court. These allegations, as currently articulated, state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.