Alo

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALCAPONE ALO, Case No. 1:22-cv-01271-ADA-BAM 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO AMEND

13 v. (Doc. 1) 14 FRESNO CITY COLLEGE, STATE

CENTER COMMUNITY COLLEGE, THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Alcapone Alo (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, initiated this 18 civil action against Fresno City College and State Center Community College on October 6, 19 2022. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff’s complaint is currently before the Court for screening. 20 II. Screening Requirement and Standard 21 The Court screens complaints brought by persons proceeding in pro se and in forma 22 pauperis. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff’s complaint, or any portion thereof, is subject to 23 dismissal if it is frivolous or malicious, if it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be 24 granted, or if it seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 25 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii). 26 A complaint must…