Covello

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 WILLIAM ROUSER, Case No. 2:21-cv-01396-KJM-JDP (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO ENFORCE SERVICE,

11 v. MOTION FOR SANCTIONS, AND

VACATING FINDINGS AND

12 S. GYLES, et al., RECOMMENDATIONS 13 Defendants. ECF Nos. 13, 24, & 26 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

15 PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BE DENIED 16 ECF No. 9 17 Plaintiff filed a preliminary injunction on October 25, 2021, ECF No. 9, and I 18 recommended that it be denied because the complaint did not raise cognizable claims. ECF No. 19 13. Although those recommendations remain pending, plaintiff has since filed a Second 20 Amended Complaint, ECF No. 14, and so I will withdraw my previous findings and 21 recommendations. The discussion below considers plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary 22 injunction, ECF No. 9, in light of his Second Amended Complaint.…