(PS) Nelson-Rogers v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20222:22-cv-01799California2,015 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARY ALICE NELSON ROGERS, No. 2:22–cv–1799–DAD–CKD PS Plaintiff, AMENDED FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. AND ORDER DENYING TRO 1 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, Defendant. 16 On October 27, 2022, plaintiff filed an emergency motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO). Plaintiff asks the court to enjoin defendant from executing an unlawful detainer. (ECF No. 6 at 1). The undersigned recommends denying plaintiff’s motion because plaintiff is unlikely to succeed on the merits of her claim. Further, plaintiff is ordered to show cause why the case should not be dismissed and why a pre-filing vexatious litigant order should not be entered barring her from filing further cases against this defendant regarding the property. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff is a serial litigant who has filed three prior actions arising from the foreclosure on her now-former residential mortgage. See 2:21-cv-02151-JAM-KJN; 2:21-cv-1809-JAM-AC; 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.