WHCF Comfrey GP, Inc. v. Community Revitalization and Development Corp.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WHCF COMFREY GP, INC., No. 2:22-cv-00982-DAD-DB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. SCHEDULING ORDER 14 COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION AND

DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,

15 Defendant. 16

COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION AND

17 DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, 18 Counter Claimant, 19 v. 20 WHCF COMFREY GP, INC., 21 Counter Defendant. 22 23 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court has reviewed the 24 parties’ joint status report (Doc. No. 16) and has determined that the court need not “consult[] 25 with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling conference,” before 26 issuing a scheduling order in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B). Accordingly, the court 27 hereby issues this scheduling order. 28 ///// 1 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 2 The named defendant has been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. 3 No further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under 4 Federal…