CDCR

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS LEE GLEASON, JR., No. 2:20-cv-00369-TLN-CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CDCR, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 I. Introduction 18 Plaintiff Thomas Lee Gleason, Jr., a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights 19 action seeking relief under 28 U.S.C. § 1983. In the first amended complaint, Gleason alleges 20 that defendant Dr. Largoza’s revocation of his housing accommodations constituted deliberate 21 indifference to his serious medical needs under the Eighth Amendment, retaliation under the First 22 Amendment, and violated California’s Bane Act and Disabled Persons Act. He also claims that 23 defendants Largoza and the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR) 24 violated Title II of the American with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Section 504 of the 25 Rehabilitation Act (Rehabilitation Act) when Largoza concluded that he did not need a bottom- 26 bunk accommodation. Defendants moved for summary judgment on…