WHCF Redding Shadowbrook GP, Inc. v. Central Valley Coalition for Affordable Housing

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20222:22-cv-00985California2,366 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WHCF REDDING SHADOWBROOK No. 2:22-cv-00985-DAD-DB

GP, INC.,

12 Plaintiff, 13 SCHEDULING ORDER v. 14

CENTRAL VALLEY COALITION FOR

15 AFFORDABLE HOUSING, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 CENTRAL VALLEY COALITION FOR

AFFORDABLE HOUSING,

18 Counter Claimant, 19 v. 20

WHCF REDDING SHADOWBROOK

21 GP, INC., 22 Counter Defendant. 23 24 Pursuant to Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the court has reviewed the 25 parties’ revised joint status report (Doc. No. 20) and has determined that the court need not 26 “consult[] with the parties’ attorneys and any unrepresented parties at a scheduling conference,” 27 before issuing a scheduling order in this case. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(1)(B). Accordingly, the 28 court hereby issues this scheduling order. 1 I. SERVICE OF PROCESS 2 The named defendants have been served as required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5. 3 No further service is permitted without leave of court, good cause having been shown under 4 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.