Warden
(HC) Bland v. Warden
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA DAVIS BLAND, Case No. 1:22-cv-01171-CDB (HC)
12 Petitioner, 13 v. O LER AD VE ER TD OIS FM ILIS ES AIN FG IR P SE TT I AT MIO EN N W DEIT DH 14 PETITION
WARDEN,
15 [THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE] Defendant. 16 17 18 Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus on September 14, 2022. (ECF No. 19 1.) A preliminary screening of the petition reveals that it fails to present any cognizable grounds 20 for relief or any facts in support. Therefore, the Court will DISMISS the petition with leave to 21 file an amended petition. 22 I. DISCUSSION 23 A. Preliminary Review of Petition 24 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Court 25 (hereinafter “Habeas Rule”) requires the Court to make a preliminary review of each petition for 26 writ of habeas corpus. The Court must summarily dismiss a petition “[i]f it plainly appears from 27 the petition…