(PC) Gray v. Clark

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THOMAS EUGENE GRAY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00196-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

13 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTON TO AMEND AND

MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY

14 KEN CLARK, et al., 15 Defendants. (Docs. 73, 75, 84) 16 17 The assigned magistrate judge issued Findings and Recommendations to deny Plaintiff’s 18 motion to amend the complaint and his motion to compel discovery. (Doc. 84.) The Court served 19 the Findings and Recommendations on the plaintiff. It contained notice that any objections were 20 to be filed within 14 days after service. (Id. at 6.) The Court advised Gray that “failure to file 21 objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the ‘right to challenge the 22 magistrate’s factual findings’ on appeal.” (Id. (quoting Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 839 23 (9th Cir. 2014)).) Gray filed objections on October 14, 2022. (Doc. 87.) Gray also filed 24 “objections” to Defendants’ opposition to Gray’s…