Antl
Antl v. AGA Service Co.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Boris Antl, No. 2:22-cv-00504-KJM-AC 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 AGA Service Co. & Jefferson Insurance Co., 1S Defendants. 16 17 18 For the second time, defendants AGA Service Company and Jefferson Insurance 19 | Company move to dismiss plaintiff Boris Antl’s fraud and California Unfair Competition Law 20 | (UCL) claims. For the reasons below, the court now grants defendants’ motion without leave to 21 | amend. 22 | I. BACKGROUND 23 The court previously granted defendants’ motion to dismiss Antl’s fraud and UCL claims 24 | because he did not allege “what led him to buy insurance from [defendants].” Prev. Order at 3-4, 25 | ECF No. 15. Antl now adds the following allegations. Before his trip to Chile, Antl visited 26 | AGA’s website because he was interested in purchasing a travel insurance plan with emergency 27 | healthcare coverage. Second Am. Compl. (SAC) §§ 16, 60, ECF No. 20. He “does not recall…