Diaz

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN E. MITCHELL, Case No. 1:22-cv-00006-JLT-EPG (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE

SCREENING FINDINGS AND

13 v. RECOMMENDATIONS 14 R. DIAZ, et al., (Docs. 24 & 27) 15 Defendants. 16 17 The magistrate judge entered screening findings and recommendations, recommending 18 that the case proceed on Mitchell’s First Amendment Free Exercise claim against Defendant 19 Rodriguez. (Doc. 27 at 14-15). The magistrate judge recommended dismissing Mitchell’s claim 20 against Rodriguez for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and dismissing his claim 21 against Defendants Stanley and Rodriguez for deprivation of his religious property in violation of 22 his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights for failure to state a claim. (Id.) The magistrate 23 judge recommended that all other claims be dismissed without prejudice because they were 24 unrelated. (Id.) 25 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this…