(PC) Nunez v. San Joaquin County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 3, 20222:22-cv-00885California1,720 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE J. NUNEZ, No. 2:22-cv-00885-EFB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY JAIL, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county jail inmate proceeding without counsel in an action brought under 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. In addition to filing a complaint (ECF No. 1), he filed an application to proceed in 19 forma pauperis (ECF No. 6). 20 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis 21 The court has reviewed plaintiff’s application and finds that it makes the showing required 22 by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1) and (2). Accordingly, by separate order, the court directs the agency 23 having custody of plaintiff to collect and forward the appropriate monthly payments for the filing 24 fee as set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) and (2). 25 Screening Standards 26 Federal courts must engage in a preliminary screening of cases in which prisoners seek 27 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.