Dahl
(PC) Adams v. Dahl
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2
3
4
5
6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PAUL ADAMS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00852-CDB (PC)
11 Plaintiff,
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
12 v. DENY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REVOKE
PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS
13 DAHL, et al., (ECF No. 32) 14 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DENY PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY
15 APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF No. 26) 16
FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE
17 18 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE (ECF No. 32-1) 19 Clerk of Court to assign a district judge. 20 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 Plaintiff Paul Adams (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 23 pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 24 Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Dahl, Rios, and Kendrix raised in Plaintiff’s first amended 25 complaint (“FAC”) for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and deliberate…