Dahl

(PC) Adams v. Dahl

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20221:20-cv-00852California5,895 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2

3

4

5

6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PAUL ADAMS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00852-CDB (PC)

11 Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

12 v. DENY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REVOKE

PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS

13 DAHL, et al., (ECF No. 32) 14 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY

15 APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF No. 26) 16

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

17 18 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE (ECF No. 32-1) 19 Clerk of Court to assign a district judge. 20 21 I. BACKGROUND 22 Plaintiff Paul Adams (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 23 pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 24 Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Dahl, Rios, and Kendrix raised in Plaintiff’s first amended 25 complaint (“FAC”) for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and deliberate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.