Dahl

(PC) Adams v. Dahl

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 4, 20221:20-cv-00852California5,895 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PAUL ADAMS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00852-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. DENY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REVOKE

PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS

DAHL, et al., (ECF No. 32) Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY

APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF No. 26)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

17 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE (ECF No. 32-1) 19 Clerk of Court to assign a district judge. 20 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Paul Adams (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s claims against Defendants Dahl, Rios, and Kendrix raised in Plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and deliberate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.