Santiago

(PC) Tirado v. Santiago

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20221:22-cv-00724California469 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 NICHOLAS ANDREW TIRADO, Case No. 1:22-cv-00724 JLT BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

13 v. ACTION, WITH PREJUDICE, FOR FAILURE

TO STATE A CLAIM, FAILURE TO OBEY A

14 SANTIAGO, et al., COURT ORDER, AND FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE

15 Defendants. (Doc. 17) 16 17 The assigned magistrate judge reviewed the allegations of Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant 18 to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A and found Plaintiff failed to comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of 19 civil Procedure and failed to state a cognizable claim upon which relief may be granted. (Doc. 16 20 at 3-9.) The magistrate judge granted Plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint or to file 21 notice of voluntary dismissal. (Id. at 10.) In addition, the Court warned Plaintiff that if he failed 22 to file an amended complaint, “the Court [would] recommend dismissal of this action, with 23 prejudice, for failure to obey a court order and for failure to state a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.