(SS) Harvey v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20221:20-cv-00077California1,871 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 RYAN CLAYTON HARVEY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00077-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING COUNSEL’S

UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ATTORNEY

13 v. FEES PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b)

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF No. 25)

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 17 I. 18 INTRODUCTION 19 Matthew F. Holmberg of the Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC 20 (“Counsel”), attorney for Ryan Clayton Harvey (“Plaintiff”), filed the instant motion for attorney 21 fees on August 22, 2022. (Mot. Att’y Fees (“Mot.”), ECF No. 25.) Counsel requests fees in the 22 gross amount of $17,000.00 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), with an offset of $3,232.79 for fees 23 previously awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d) (“EAJA”). 24 Plaintiff was served with the motion and advised that any opposition to the motion was to be 25 filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 25 at 1-2, 23.) Plaintiff did not file an opposition to the 26 motion, nor did Defendant. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.