Hudson

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CIRON B. SPRINGFIELD, No. 2:22-cv-0328 DAD CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 P. HUDSON, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and seeking relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 18 1983 against employees of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. On 19 March 16, 2022, the court screened plaintiff’s complaint as the court is required to do under 28 20 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). Plaintiff compliant was dismissed with leave to file an amended complaint. 21 Plaintiff has now filed an amended complaint.1 22 The court how reviewed the amended complaint and finds that it fails to state a claim 23 upon which relief can be granted and therefore must be dismissed under the terms of 28 U.S.C. § 24 1915A(a). Good cause appearing, the amended complaint will be dismissed and plaintiff will be 25 given 30 days within which to file a second amended complaint. 26 1 In the court’s March 16 order, plaintiff was informed that his…