(PS) White v. City and County of West Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20222:20-cv-02383California1,493 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBBIE D. WHITE, No. 2:20-cv-02383-MCE-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER 14 CITY OF WEST SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Robbie D. White (“Plaintiff”) initiated the present civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Defendants for claims arising out of Plaintiff’s 19 detention and arrest. Second Am. Compl., ECF No. 53 (“SAC”). Presently before the 20 Court are five Motions to Dismiss the SAC by the following groups of Defendants: 21 (1) City of West Sacramento (“City”), and Officers Nathan Ogden (“Ogden”), Jason 22 Mahaffey (“Mahaffey”), and Austin Schreiber (“Schreiber”), ECF No. 56; (2) County of 23 Yolo (“County”), ECF No. 65; (3) Sheriff Tom Lopez (“Lopez”) and Deputy David Santos 24 (“Santos”), ECF No. 71; (4) Officers Christopher Cobb (“Cobb”), Matthew Montez 25 (“Montez”), Daniel Boehle (“Boehle”), and Andrey Kinda (“Kinda”), ECF No. 77; and 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 (5) Sergeant Stefan Iwanicki (“Iwanicki”),…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.