Fry

Fry v. Navistar, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20222:22-cv-01201California2,692 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ADAM FRY, No. 2:22-cv-01201-DAD-JDP Plaintiff, v. ORDER GRANTING PLANTIFF’S MOTION

TO REMAND THIS ACTION AND

NAVISTAR, INC., et al., DENYING AS MOOT DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 6, 7) 16 This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s motion to remand this action to the Yolo County Superior Court (Doc. No. 7) and defendant Navistar, Inc.’s motion to dismiss plaintiff’s claims brought against defendant Jeffrey Dossey, who defendant Navistar contends was fraudulently joined in this action to defeat diversity jurisdiction, (Doc. No. 8). The pending motions were taken under submission on the papers on August 1, 2022. (Doc. No. 10.) For the reasons explained below, plaintiff’s motion to remand will be granted and defendant’s motion to dismiss will be denied as having been rendered moot. BACKGROUND On May 27, 2022, plaintiff Adam Fry filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.