Conti

Conti v. L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20221:19-cv-00769California11,552 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 11 ANGELA CONTI and JUSTINE MORA, No. 1:19-cv-00769-JLT-SKO 12 individuals, on behalf of themselves and on behalf of all persons similarly situated, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION 13 FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF Plaintiffs, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 14 v. (Doc. 28.) 15 L’OREAL USA S/D INC., a Corporation; 16 and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 17 Defendant. 18 Angela Conti and Justine Mora assert that L’Oreal USA S/D Inc. failed to comply with 19 California wage and hour laws by failing to pay all wages due and provide proper meal and rest 20 breaks. Conti and Mora now seek preliminary approval of a settlement reached in this action. 21 Specifically, Plaintiffs seek: (1) conditional certification of the settlement class; (2) preliminary 22 approval of the settlement terms; (3) appointment of Conti and Mora as the class representative; 23 (4)appointment of the firm of Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik De Blouw LLP as class 24 counsel; (5) approval of the class notice materials; (6) appointment of ILYM Group as the 25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.