Catanghal

Catanghal v. Greyhound Lines Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20221:22-cv-00961California3,924 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 GERALD DE LEON CATANGHAL, Case No. 1:22-cv-00961-EPG 11 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER 12 v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO:

13 GREYHOUND LINES, INC., (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR 14 Defendant. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES 15 TO STAND ON HIS COMPLAINT

16 (ECF NO. 1)

17 THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

18 19 Plaintiff Gerald De Leon Catanghal, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this action on August 2, 2022, under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12112 20 et seq., and alleges that Defendant Greyhound Lines, Inc. has engaged in discriminatory 21 employment practices. Plaintiff further alleges Defendant has engaged in unfair labor practices 22 pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 7116. The Court now screens Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 23 1915. 24 The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s complaint and finds that Plaintiff fails to state…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.