(PC) Gaskins v. Mule Creek State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20222:22-cv-00459California913 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 JOSEPH GASKINS, Case No. 2:22-cv-00459-JDP (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

12 v. PAUPERIS 13 MULE CREEK STATE PRISON, ECF No. 13 14 Defendant. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 15 (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT

SUBJECT TO A

16 RECOMMENDATION OF

DISMISSAL

17 (2) FILE AN AMENDED 18 COMPLAINT 19 ECF No. 1 20 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 21 22

23 24 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, alleges that he was transferred to Mule Creek State Prison 25 without his personal property. ECF No. 1 at 2-3. He does not name any individual responsible 26 for this deprivation and has sued only the prison itself. He has not made out a cognizable claim. 27 I will give plaintiff leave to amend before recommending that this action be dismissed. I will also 28 grant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.