Cisnero
(PC) Hearns v. Cisnero
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CLARENCE L. HEARNS, Case No.: 1:22-cv-01033-JLT-CDB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
13 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION AND TEMPORARY
14 CISNERO, et al., RESTRAINING ORDER 15 Defendants. (Docs. 3, 13) 16 17 Clarence L. Hearns is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge 19 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 Plaintiff seeks injunctive relief restraining SATF “employees, as well as subcontractors 21 and JPay employees” from confiscating “JPay-5 Tablets” and from removing or discontinuing the 22 “JPay wifi and kiosk.” (Doc. 3.) As an initial matter, the assigned magistrate judge found that 23 because the defendants have not been served, “this Court does not have personal jurisdiction over 24 the named defendants and may not act at this…