(SS) Bell v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20221:21-cv-00786California442 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KAREN BELL, Case No. 1:21-cv-00786-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’

STIPULATED MOTION TO REMAND

13 v. UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL DECISION AND 14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, ACTING REMANDING CASE1

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

15 SECURITY,, (Doc. No. 19) 16 Defendant.

ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

17 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

18 (Doc. No. 18) 19 20 21 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed November 4, 2022. 22 (Doc. No. 19). Plaintiff Karen Bell and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that this case 23 should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 24 405(g). (Id.). 25 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 26 conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.