Garza

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHN P. GARZA, Case No. 1:22-cv-01051-JLT-CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO KEVIN M. BADKOUBEHI TO

SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS

13 v. SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR

PRACTICE IN THIS COURT WITHOUT

14 BG RETAIL LLC, FIRST SEEKING ADMISSION

15 Defendant. THREE-DAY DEADLINE 16 17 18 On August 22, 2022, the Clerk of Court directed attorney for Plaintiff, Kevin M. 19 Badkoubehi, to register for admission to this Court. (ECF No. 6.) To date, Mr. Badkoubehi has 20 failed to comply with this direction. 21 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules 22 or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 23 sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 24 control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, 25 including dismissal of the action. Bautista v. Los Angeles County, 216…